Bell Curve The Law Talking Guy Raised by Republicans U.S. West
Well, he's kind of had it in for me ever since I accidentally ran over his dog. Actually, replace "accidentally" with "repeatedly," and replace "dog" with "son."

Monday, September 26, 2005

Another Rant About What Liberalism Is

I have a pet peeve. The abuse of the word "liberal" by Americans. Americans, both on the right and the left, use the word "liberal" to mean left-wing. American conservatives abuse it further by equating liberal with socialist which they further equate with communist. But this is not what liberal means to political scientists, economist or anyone outside of the United States. To everyone else in the world "liberal" refers to a group of political parties around the world that emphasize individual liberty (thus the name). These parties are all secular (unlike the American Republican party which is de facto a Christian Democratic party) and all espouse strong support for civil liberties (again unlike the Republicans and their Democratic supporters who passed the Patriot Act). Liberal parties also tend to support market based solutions over statist solutions thus distinguishing them from Social Democrats, Christian Democrats, Conservatives and Fascist parties who all espouse various combinations of corportism and mercantilism.

Anyway, my new favorite party is the British Liberal Democratic Party. If you want to see a good argument against the British Labour Party's version of the Patriot Act and against the war in Iraq read this address by Lib Dem leader Charles Kennedy.

I fear I'm waging a pointless struggle but I think Americans would naturally take to a truly Liberal Party if only they were given the option. Back in olden tymes, both the Democrats and the Republicans were essentially Liberal parties in the classical sense. They disagreed about which aspects of the Liberal ideology should be emphasized but they were both Liberal. Now neither party is Liberal but the Democrats are closer than the Republicans. The Democrats have a large faction that are essentially Social Democrats and a faction that has the potential to be a true Liberal party (the Democratic Leadership Council - see link to the right). The Republicans have completely abandoned Liberalism in favor of corporatist economic policy merged with "Christian" social policy. That's why I hope that the Democratic party will embrace its Liberal origins and challenge the Republicans' new anti-market, pro-corporate, anti-liberty ideology.

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

It is interesting to watch political parties transform right in front of our eyes. It seems like this time it was started by the Republican party and now the Dems are going to change in reaction. How often does this kind of thing happen? 

// posted by Bell Curve

Dr. Strangelove said...

I can't help noticing that the definition of a "liberal" party (strong emphasis on individual civil liberties, preference for free-market solutions over statist solutions) sounds rather like the platform of the American Libertarian party. Is this accurate, or are there other distinctions we should make?

Anonymous said...

Bell Curve, I'm not a specialist in American political development but my understanding is that this happens about every 50-70 years. One could argue that this current transformation started not with the Republicans but with the Democrats when that party rejected segregation and Southern Democrats began switching to the Republicans. Nixon embraced this development and started the GOP on the now infamous "Southern Strategy" which was based on thinly veiled allusions to race and other dearly held "traditions" of the rural white South (the Evangelical Conservatives/Flat Earthers are strongest among the same demographic).

Dr. Strangelove, indeed the Libertarians do share these views. They are the Liberal equivolent of super orthodox religious believers. They are so liberal they nearly anarchists. My disagreements with them are based on their over strict adherence to ideology that leads them to some impractical positions on things like tax, welfare, education and public health policy (they discount the existence of "market failures" and the need for government role in providing "public goods"). However, I have actually voted for a Libertarian Congressional candidate because my local Democrat voted to support that part of the Patriot Act that allows the FBI to secretly investigate book purchases and library records without a warrant. In my district, the Libertarian was only candidate who was right on what for me was the most important issue (being an academic who buys and checks out a lot of books on politically controversial subjects). 

// posted by Raised By Republicans

Anonymous said...

To answer your next question Dr. Strangelove, I think the reason the Libertarians haven't cought on here in the US is their orthodoxy. None of the other Liberal parties I've mentioned are so strict in their opposition to any role for government in anything. There is a range of liberal ideologies and the Libertarians are on the fringe. Also, there was a thriving economic-liberal wing in the GOP until very recently.  

// posted by Raised By Republicans

Anonymous said...

Oh, another little tidbit about the range of liberal thought. Both the ACLU and the Cato Institute are Liberal.  

// posted by Raised By Republicans