Bell Curve The Law Talking Guy Raised by Republicans U.S. West
Well, he's kind of had it in for me ever since I accidentally ran over his dog. Actually, replace "accidentally" with "repeatedly," and replace "dog" with "son."

Saturday, June 18, 2005

The Latest EU Crisis

Hi Everyone,

Following closely on the heals of the French and Dutch rejections of the EU Constitution, the EU is "crisis" again. This time the issue is the EU budget specifically the amount of money contributed to it by each of the member states (especially the United Kingdom).

The big fight is over the so called British rebate. This is a reduction in the amount of the U.K.'s contribution to the EU budget meant to compensate the U.K. for the fact that they don't benefit at all from Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) subsidies (which are by far the largest single budget item in the EU budget). The U.K. wisely abolished its agriculture subsidies (the infamous "Corn Laws") in the 19th century and since has transformed almost entirely into an industrial/service sector economy. Less than 1% of the British labor force are engaged in agriculture. The French want the British rebate reduced or removed entirely. The British and the Dutch want the CAP subsidies reduced first. The French refuse to even consider reducing CAP subsidies. And since unanimity is the rule of the day...stalemate.

To give you an idea of how grasping the French government is being over this issue take a look at the table in this BBC article. The table shows net contributions to the EU budget. That is, the amount each member state contributes minus the amount they get back in CAP subsidies, structural funds and - in the case of the U.K. - rebates. Notice that France (pop = 60.68 million) contributes less to the EU budget than either the U.K. (pop = 60.14 million) or the Netherlands (pop = 16.4 million!). Why? Because the CAP is set up to allow the French government to continue subsidizing its grossly inefficient (but politically powerful) agricultural sector without having to pay the bill themselves! The EU has an average of 2.2% of its labor force employed in agriculture (and that includes the newest 10 member states in Eastern Europe!). France has 4.6% of its labor force "employed" in agriculture.

I would like to propose a solution that is easy to present as "fair" and would actually be good policy (a rare combination!). Abolish the CAP and give all the member states a rebate (that is reduce their overall contributions to the EU budget)! That would allow countries like Poland to take advantage of their own economic strengths on a level playing field (the CAP rigs the competition in favor of less efficient French farmers!). Abolishing the CAP would also decrease the budgetary burden on the EU as a whole reducing the need for contributions from all the member states. And it would open the European agriculture and food market to imports from developing countries that need the new opportunities. Finally, it would reduce food prices for the urban poor in Europe. The big losers would be 4.6% of the French population. But 95.4% of the French population would benefit! 97.8% of the population of the EU overall would benefit! (I got the figures from the CIA world fact book - see link to the right)

Oh, and by the way, the French farmers were the ones who really drove the "non" vote on the constitution referendum - this despite the fact they are essentially making their livings from EU handouts. How do you say "bite the hand that feeds you" in French?

Perhaps our recently returned "Correspondent in France" could give us the local view. Why do French farmers hate the EU cash cow?


Anonymous said...

Are we French citizens now? 

// posted by Law Talking Guy

Anonymous said...

We are citizens of the world, dude!  

// posted by Raised By Republicans

Anonymous said...

I am feverishly trying to get actual French people to comment on this. In the meantime, let me say that the French will NEVER go for reduced or eliminated ag subsidies. Not only would the farmers go berserk, but so would the general population. They really feel this attachment to the land in ways we don't. ("They" being a gross generalization, of course). 

// posted by Bell Curve

Anonymous said...

Well, why should they want to give up the subsidies. They aren't the ones paying for them. That's the problem.

// posted by Raised By Republicans

Anonymous said...

Chinese citizens are thin because they drink tea. Tea is sizzling
and sizzling water melts fat and oils.

My site :: build muscle mass without fat

Anonymous said...

The issue, M_W, is that somebody like myself who has 5000+ images on Picasa
and suddenly finds them blocked or who uses Facebook for organization is receiving
the message loud and distinct here; China does
not welcome foreigners. Your own compatriot on this list returned
to locate his FB blocked and i guess he wishes he'd in no way left the USA now.

my web site :: online dating statistics marriage

Anonymous said...

You f***ing idiot superman wins every time,Hulk gets FASTER,
STRONGER, a much better healing factor,and a harder skin the angrier he gets.

Dude,Hulk was thrown to the core from the sunlight prior to and he acquired from it with no scratch or burnt,he just received
Superman's Laser eyes are absolutely nothing compared towards the Sunlight.
Freezing Hulk won't kill him,he
was froze just before a million occasions and often breaks out.

Superman sure outfasts Hulk,but Hulk gets faster with anger.

Same goes for strength,Hulk can preserve acquiring stronger till he reaches
Superman's class and beats him.

Also visit my webpage :: how to stop premature ejaculation tips