tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6762928.post113276938186658341..comments2024-01-03T05:23:36.046-08:00Comments on The Citizens: Is this progress?Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6762928.post-1133936103718118402005-12-06T22:15:00.000-08:002005-12-06T22:15:00.000-08:00It is appalling that a man calling himself the Vic...It is appalling that a man calling himself the Vicar of Christ can think of nothing better to do than go on a witchhunt for gays.  <BR/><BR/><A></A><A></A>// posted by<A><B> </B></A>LTGAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6762928.post-1133309850578605322005-11-29T16:17:00.000-08:002005-11-29T16:17:00.000-08:00What is the difference between "transitory" (which...What is the difference between "transitory" (which sounds like a bad traveling habit) and "Deep-seated" homosexuality?<BR/><BR/>It shows a complete lack of sophistication about homosexuality and people in general. Look, I am heterosexual and there is nothing you can do to change that. So why do people think homosexuality is a "condition" than can be "cured" or a deviant behavior that can be modified? The Church says homosexuality is a, "sexual tendency and not an identity." What-everrrrr. <BR/><BR/>You know, as Freud might point out, all of that sexual repression results in a Church overly obsessed with sex.<BR/> <BR/><BR/><A></A><A></A>// posted by<A><B> </B></A>USWestAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6762928.post-1133243995858689712005-11-28T21:59:00.000-08:002005-11-28T21:59:00.000-08:00I still like the joke at the end of "The Aristocra...I still like the joke at the end of "The Aristocrats" the best:<BR/><BR/>"I was out to dinner and saw a couple of priests dining together at a neighboring table. I didn't know whether to send them a bottle of wine or a Cub Scout."<BR/><BR/>Yeah.<BR/><BR/>BL <BR/><BR/><A></A><A></A>// posted by<A><B> </B></A><A HREF="http://dapeeg.blogger.com" REL="nofollow" TITLE="dapeeg at comcast dot net">Bob Lewis</A>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6762928.post-1132776080857391052005-11-23T12:01:00.000-08:002005-11-23T12:01:00.000-08:00The old rule was that priests could not be gay, bu...The old rule was that priests could not be gay, but they did not say exactly what that meant. Does a single homosexual experience make one "gay"? Or is it merely an instance of sin? Clearly, under the old rules, a few acts could be forgiven as sins. And priests were not required to be free of sin or free of lusty thoughts.<BR/><BR/>The new rules are more strict. Even a single act in the previous three years is now unforgiveable for a priest. And once may not even have "tendencies" or support gay culture. Pretty harsh, if you ask me.Dr. Strangelovehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14407042105777411150noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6762928.post-1132771886702615682005-11-23T10:51:00.000-08:002005-11-23T10:51:00.000-08:00Are there rules about how long you have to wait af...Are there rules about how long you have to wait after having sex with a woman? What, exactly, counts as "sex" in this context? If you only ashamedly paid for gay sex, rather than having a open relationship and as part of the 'gay culture', is that better or worse? <BR/><BR/>I can see the T-shirt now: "Priest in Training: 2 years and 362 days to since last Saturday." <BR/><BR/>Or just: Silence = Silence <BR/><BR/><A></A><A></A>// posted by<A><B> </B></A>LTGAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com