tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6762928.post112969436147392985..comments2024-01-03T05:23:36.046-08:00Comments on The Citizens: More on California's Special Election and LaborUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6762928.post-1129762608310417642005-10-19T15:56:00.000-07:002005-10-19T15:56:00.000-07:00An even better analogy would be that Corporations ...An even better analogy would be that Corporations can donate to politicians without each STOCK HOLDER's consent! Can you imagine how difficult it would be to get every single stock holder to even mail in the cards that say "you may donate to politicians from party X." <BR/><BR/><A></A><A></A>// posted by<A><B> </B></A><A HREF="http://thecitizens.blogspot.com/" REL="nofollow" TITLE="">Raised By Republicans</A>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6762928.post-1129743572604191552005-10-19T10:39:00.000-07:002005-10-19T10:39:00.000-07:00I think the unions have the right strategy on this...I think the unions have the right strategy on this one. They are spending money to ultimately defeate the governor in 2006. They can't afford to spend money on a competing initiative that will confuse voters and which--even if it passes--will be less devastating to corporate contributors than to unions, since the CEOS tend to be personally wealthy anyhow.<BR/><BR/>"Change to Win" isn't much of a change and I don't expect them to start winning. Am I wrong on this?Dr. Strangelovehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14407042105777411150noreply@blogger.com